1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

1. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on April 13, 2018, setting the period of the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 700,000 (excluding value-added tax), management fee of KRW 120,000,000, and the period of the lease from May 3, 2018 to May 3, 2019. However, the case where the overdue rent falls short of the amount of rent of two years, the contract was concluded on the ground of termination of the contract; the defendant occupied and used the building on which the building entered in the attached list was leased from around that time to the date, and the fact that the overdue rent exceeds the lease deposit, and the plaintiff expressed his/her intention to terminate the said lease by delivery of a duplicate of the complaint in this case to the defendant.

According to the above facts, the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant on the building listed in the attached list was lawfully terminated on the grounds of the defendant's delinquency in rent, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the building listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.