logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.23 2016나308171
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the written evidence Nos. 12 and 13, which is insufficient to admit the Plaintiff’s assertion as evidence submitted in the court of first instance, is rejected; and (b) the reasoning of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance, except for the relevant part being dried or added, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the text of the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court sentenced ① “A person who is to receive the above seizure and collection order,” “A person who is to receive the above seizure and collection order,” ② “A court” in the third Myeon 9 as “Abol branch of the Daegu District Court,” ③ “Ack-gu District Court was sentenced” in the third Myeon 13 as “Ack-gu District Court,” and the judgment dismissing the appeal on April 7, 2017 (Seoul District Court 2016No351) was sentenced (Seoul District Court 2017No3502), and the appeal was dismissed on June 1, 2017 (Supreme Court 2017Do502), and the dismissal of the appeal was finalized on June 5, 2017 (Supreme Court 2017Do502),” and “Ack-Ga 18, 199” in the third Myeon 9, and “Ack-105 Myeon 197.”

B. The following is added subsequent to the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment on the ground that the 6th sentence was “time”.

“The husband of the Defendant seems to have become aware of the fact that the Defendant was in de facto marital relationship with the previous Plaintiff only after he was on September 1, 2015 (see, e.g., evidence No. 10-3, No. 14, No. 15, No. 4-2, No. 11)”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow