Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2012, the Defendant used a computer to have D, E, F, and G receive criminal punishment from the Defendant’s house of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, on May 31, 2012, on May 17, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant jointly, and put the Defendant on approximately three weeks of high-level salt, inspection, etc.

'' has drawn up a letter of complaint.

However, the fact is that the defendant drinked alcohol on May 17, 2012 to D, E, F, and G, and assaulted upon G, E, and D, and that F, D, by extracting the solar f, installed in the front of an Imart, about 5 meters away from the front place of the horse, and caused an injury requiring treatment for about 3 weeks, and the defendant did not suffer an assault from the above 4 persons, such as the contents of the complaint.

Nevertheless, on June 1, 2012, the Defendant received a letter of accusation by mail at the Do Government Police Station located in Do Government-si 2, 420 Dong-si, Do Government-si, and Do Government Police Station on June 6, 2012, and on June 11, 2012, the Do Government Police Station stated the same purport in Do, E, F, and G at the Do Government Police Station on October 23, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol for G, D, F, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 (Confession) of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The agreement is reached in the case of injury with the intent to avoid the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the injury involved is dismissed in the workplace which has continued to work since 195 where imprisonment is sentenced.