Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. Of the area of 1,283 square meters in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Pohang-gu, Seoul, each point is indicated in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Article 7 (1) of the instant lease agreement is concluded, the lessee should restore the land immediately after the termination of the contract to its original condition and order the lessor to do so.
If the lessee fails to specify the principal land even after the termination of this contract, he/she shall pay to the lessor the amount of damages of KRW 100,000 per day.
(2) If a lessee neglects to reinstate, the lessor may reinstate at his/her expense.
1) On October 10, 2006, the Plaintiff, the owner of the Nam-gu C Dae-gu 1,283 square meters at port, is the owner of the above real estate, and on October 10, 2006, the Plaintiff, the owner of the above real estate, 420 square meters of land (hereinafter “the instant land”), including both (i), (ii), (c), (iv), and (v) parts of the attached Form 2.
(2) Among the specifications indicated in the attached Form 2, a building on the ground (b), (d), and (e) part (hereinafter referred to as “instant leased building”) in the ship.
A) A lease was made by setting the rent of KRW 2.5 million per annum and the term of lease by October 10, 2009 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).
(2) Of the terms and conditions of the instant lease agreement, Article 7 is as follows. 2) For the instant construction project, the Defendant: (a) ordered the instant land to be indicated with drawings indicated in attached Form 2 (1) and (c) on each ground of each part of the instant lease agreement.
It is used after construction of each building described in the subsection.
(hereinafter “instant ground structure”). (b)
1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to continuously renew the instant lease agreement and increase the rent to KRW 3 million per annum from around 2013. However, the Defendant did not pay the rent from October 11, 2014. (2) The Plaintiff declared that the instant lease agreement was terminated on the grounds of the Defendant’s failure to pay rent for more than two years, as the instant complaint, and the duplicate was served on the Defendant on April 25, 2018.
[Ground] Facts without dispute, Gap 12 evidence, result of on-site verification, result of a request for surveying appraisal, purport of whole pleadings
2. At least two occasions the Plaintiff determined the cause of the claim.