beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) Appendix 21 appraisal drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, among buildings listed in the attached list 1 list;
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building listed in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter “instant building”). The Defendant is operating a restaurant with the name “C” in the attached Table 21st appraisal of the instant building, among the instant buildings, in the name of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 159 square meters in sequence of each of the items in (a), 159 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant store”).
B. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement and succeeded thereto (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) with D, the former owner, and the building of this case, KRW 10 million in lease deposit, KRW 1 million in monthly rent, and KRW 1 million in lease term, from July 15, 2016 to July 14, 2018.
(1) Article 1(1) of the Act provides that a lessor may terminate this Agreement immediately when the annual rent of a lessee exceeds the amount of a three-year rent or violates Article 3. In the event that a lease contract is terminated, the lessee shall restore the above real estate to its original state and return it to the lessor. In such a case, the lessor shall return the deposit to the lessee, and if the overdue rent or the amount of damages is paid, it shall be removed and the balance shall be refunded. 2) The relevant provisions of the instant lease agreement are as follows.
3) On December 27, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased the instant building from D, and on February 28, 2017, succeeded to the lessor’s status under the instant lease agreement by completing the registration of ownership transfer on the instant building. (c) The Defendant agreed that the Plaintiff would change the instant lease agreement from 1 million to 1.1 million won. On March 28, 2017, the Plaintiff paid 1.1 million won to the Plaintiff as the rent for the instant lease agreement, and thereafter, paid 1.1 million won to the Plaintiff as follows.