Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2010. 11. 16. 06:10경 부천시 오정구 D건물 203동 지하 1층 위생실에서 자칭 입주자 대표인 A이 K 주식회사 소유의 직원명부, 이력서사본, 소모품수불대장, 출근부 등 서류를 가져가려고 하는 것을 위생실 직원인 피해자 P가 제지하자 피해자의 왼쪽 가슴부분을 주먹으로 수회 때리고 발로 오른쪽 옆구리 부위를 1회 차고 멱살을 잡아 넘어뜨리고 Q, R는 이에 합세하여 피해자의 손목을 잡고 발로 찼다.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with Q Q and R, inflicted injury on the victim, such as multiple diversity accounts that need to be treated for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendant, Q and R’s legal statement

1. Partial entry of the protocol of examination of the suspect against the accused in the prosecution (including the part of the P confrontation);

1. A witness P or L legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of P;

1. Statement of the police about P, L, and S, and a written statement of P;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc. and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant alleged that the victim was removed from the victim in order to restrain the victim P, but during that process, the Defendant did not commit any act, such as drinking or cutting off the victim. However, the Defendant’s statement at the investigative agency and court, L’s investigative agency and court, statement in the court (in the face of the escape room, work clothes are taken into the room) (in the face of the escape room, the instant facts charged can be acknowledged, in full view of the aforementioned evidence, such as the injury diagnosis letter, and the hole of P (see, e.g., page 549).