1. The Defendant’s disposition of imposing penalty points to the Plaintiffs on July 30, 2014 is revoked in entirety.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff Engineering Co., Ltd. (the former trade name was a “stock company,” hereinafter the “Plaintiff Company”) is a company that was in charge of the supervision of the electrical works performed by the company “Sesan F&F” (hereinafter the “SP”) among the reconstruction works ordered by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, “Sesan M&F welfare center for the visually disabled at Sinsan-won,” and the Plaintiff A is a person who belongs to the Plaintiff Company and performed the duties of the supervisor of the instant electrical works.

B. On May 24, 2014, the Defendant conducted an irregular inspection on the instant electrical construction site. As a result of the inspection, the Defendant found that one employee of Sungsan T&P, a contractor, is working for the electrical cable mooring without concluding a safety stand in the upper part of the electric distribution unit inside the underground floor inside the instant construction site (2.4m high).

C. On June 19, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the fact that “The instant points are to be given the first point of points to the Plaintiffs, who are supervisory companies and supervisors, pursuant to Article 12(8) of the Electric Technology Management Act, as it is intended to impose the second point of points to each of the Plaintiffs who are responsible for supervision and supervisors, who are likely to use a safety belt when conducting cable landing operations at the inside power distribution team of the underground floor (hereinafter referred to as “instant points”).”

After that, on July 30, 2014, the defendant notified the plaintiffs on July 30, 2014 that the defendant should give one point of points to each of the plaintiffs in relation to the electrical construction of this case.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of Imposing penalty points of this case"). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, or the purport of all pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition of imposing penalty points of this case is legitimate;

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the plaintiffs are given the penalty points of this case for the following reasons.