1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the court's reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: (a) the court's explanation of this case is identical to the ground of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding "(at least 34 places around August 34, 2014, at least 34 places around September 34, and at least 2 places around October 2, 2014)" to "the fact that no new store was opened" in Section 7 of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) thereby, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that the Plaintiff’s appeal did not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance court were examined, it is not sufficient to recognize that the duties, intensity, and stress were excessive at the time of the instant accident, or that the duties of the deceased were caused by rapid aggravation of the state of the deceased’s health beyond natural progress, and thus, caused the death. Accordingly, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and therefore, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent