1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds alleged in the trial while the plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the grounds alleged in the judgment of the court of first instance.

As a result of the fact-finding on the president of the Korean Medical Association of Medical Doctors, the purport of the fact-finding is as follows: “A patient with past cerebral chronism is highly likely to be accompanied by the chronological chronologicalism to the body of his body, and such patient is a high-risk soldier of the brus heart disease, but it is impossible to answer the speed of the chronological chronological chronological chronologicalism

In full view of the above fact-finding results and the circumstances arising from the first instance court’s reasoning, it is difficult to view that there was a cerebral brain color on the left-hand side of the deceased due to the merger between the above fact-finding and the above fact-finding results, or that there was no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court are recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.