All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses even though he/she was sentenced to six times or more as a result of the larceny, and that the Defendant did not commit any of the instant offenses during the period of repeated crime, and that the method of theft by intrusion upon another person’s house and did not have to recover from damage is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, it is favorable to the defendant that the defendant is a disabled person of Grade II with intellectual disability and raises a baby born around September 2014, raises a baby who committed a crime, is recognized as committing a crime, and the total amount of damage caused by theft and fraud is not large, and paid KRW 300,000,000, which is part of the damage amount to the victim D.

In full view of these circumstances and other circumstances, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant and the prosecutor’s allegation of unfair sentencing is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.