logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.10 2014노413
절도등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine both parties’ assertion of unfair sentencing.

The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant returned and agreed to the victim D of the thief crime of this case, the fact that the defendant's health conditions are not good due to military surgery and urology, and the fact that the defendant is in an economically difficult situation as a basic living recipient.

However, in light of the method of crime and the amount of damage, etc., the crime of larceny and unlicensed driving of this case committed by the defendant in intrusion upon the warehouse managed by another person, stolen the stolen goods in the aggregate amount of KRW 15.8 million, and driving them on the cargo vehicle without a driver's license, and in view of the method of crime and the amount of damage, etc., the crime of fraud of this case is not appropriate. In light of the fact that each of the crime of fraud of this case was committed by deceiving four victims, even though the defendant did not have the intent to repay or have the ability to repay, and received the money as a total of KRW 48.5 million from them, and did not reach an agreement with the victims, the case is not easy, and the defendant did not obtain a driver's license at one time, and there was no history of punishment by a fine at least three times in the past, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing cannot be justified.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow