The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the defendant insults the victim;

2. Determination:

A. On May 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) connected the D office located in Gwangju-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the Facebook; (b) referring to the victim E ( South and 61 years old); and (c) hereinafter referred to as “finite taxi drivers E; and (d) made a public insult of the victim.”

B. 1) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the following facts are recognized.

① 피고인은 2015. 3. 2. 경 차량을 운전하여 가 던 중 피해자가 운전하는 택시가 피고인 차량 앞 편도 1 차로 도로를 막고 정차해 있자 중앙선을 넘어 피해자 택시를 추월해 가면서 피해자에게 욕설을 하였고, 이에 피해자가 3~4 회 경적을 울리고 전조등을 3~4 회 깜빡거리면서 피고인 차량을 뒤쫓아 가다가 피고인 차량을 추월하여 그 앞을 가로막았고, 이어서 피고인과 피해자가 차에서 내려 시비를 벌이던 중 피고인이 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들었다.

② The victim accused the Defendant as a crime of assaulting the instant case, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 on July 23, 2015.

③ On June 7, 2016, the Defendant filed a complaint with the victim due to threatening driving, etc., and the victim was subject to a disposition without suspicion on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize the intention of intimidation, even though it is deemed that he/she overtakens the Defendant’s vehicle while sounding the warning at the prosecution.

④ Since then, the victim brought a lawsuit claiming consolation money against the Defendant on the ground that he did not have been able to conduct an investigation about the threatening driving.

(5) On May 30, 2016, the Defendant written a notice on the day on which the Defendant had been between the victim and the victim on his/her page and on his/her own page, and on his/her own, in the investigative process, trial process, etc., and written the notice in which he/she had a string mind, and “fluent taxi drivers E”.