1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as that of the defendant among the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases of dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2).

2. The defendant's "E" at the bottom of 6 parallels at the bottom of 3 pages of the cut part shall be raised to "E".

5 pages 13-18 (the part of paragraph (a) of this Article) are as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

A. The Defendants’ defenses are unlawful in all of the instant lawsuit filed against the Defendants after the lapse of the exclusion period of each one year, inasmuch as they become aware of the grounds for revocation around December 21, 2010 by Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff A, around July 29, 2010, after receiving a provisional attachment order on the claim for the payment of the construction price under the Party E’s contract, with the third obligor’s deposit or notification.

The 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 4th 3th 4, A’s 5th 6, and B’s 6th 7th 7th 6th

The fact that “the fact recorded” was recorded at the 6th lower end of the 6th page, and that SN Construction filed a lawsuit of demurrer against the Defendant C, like the Plaintiff B, while participating in the distribution procedure of the said deposit (Scheon District Court Gangnam Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Court) and that the said support was 201Gadan8900. The part of “the fact that Plaintiff A exists” at the 4-5 level lower end of the 6th page 6th page, stating that “A exists the attachment and assignment order of the instant claim No. 2 around July 2010, and that Plaintiff B had the existence of the attachment and assignment order of the instant claim No. 1 on December 2010.”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all of the defendant's appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.