1. The Defendant: 29,863,200 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from April 19, 2017 to October 18, 2018; and

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Urban planning facility business name: Urban planning facility business (road, oil pipeline opening and removal and removal construction within the E apartment zone; hereinafter referred to as “instant public project”): Public announcement of project approval: F (F) announced in Yanan City ( June 1, 2015), G ( February 1, 2016), H ( March 11, 2016), public notification in Yanan City (hereinafter referred to as “public project”); public notification in Yananan City ( May 23, 2016)

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

(c) On September 26, 2016, the date of the decision to expropriate the Plaintiff or the date of the decision to expropriate the Plaintiff’s business subject to expropriation of compensation for loss, JJ large 368§³ in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul on November 10, 2016, J (1st floor), 95.79§³ in JJ-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul on November 26, 2016, 63.24 square meters in light of house (2 floors), and 2 weeks in trees on August 22, 2016, 3rd on August 22, 2016, the date of the decision to expropriate the Plaintiff or the date of the decision to expropriate the Plaintiff’s business subject to expropriation of compensation for loss.

(d) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on the Plaintiff’s Compensation for Losses (won): B 89,106,500 C 27,653,00 D 158,268,500 D 158,268,50 [Grounds for Recognition: Each entry in evidence A Nos. 1 and 2] on February 23, 2017;

2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiff A shall pay the plaintiff A a reasonable amount of compensation based on the court's appraisal of the land subject to expropriation and the amount of compensation for the difference between the amount of compensation and the amount of compensation for the said adjudication, and the delay damages for the said amount.

B. Of the Plaintiff B’s building, only part of the first floor and the second floor are included in the subject of expropriation, but part of the prefabricated-type building operated by “K” among the first floor not included in the subject of expropriation cannot be used for its original purpose, and the remaining building cannot be used for its original purpose. The Defendant should pay the Plaintiff B the compensation for the remaining building and the compensation for its delay.

C. The plaintiff C is the above building owned by the plaintiff C.