A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

(A)The Defendant, as a regular director of theC, is taking overall charge of the work, to request testing and analysis to an authorized agency for Fin, fin-1, K-2, the munitions of K-2, which are the munitions of the K-2, and to submit the test results received from the authorized agency to (D).

When the Defendant received a request to submit a test report on the location and mechanical nature of the above parts in supplying finine, V, and stacks, the Defendant altered the test report of the relevant parts on the grounds that the test result falls short of the standard value, the cost of request for test, and the period of payment promotion, etc., and issued it to the inspector in charge of D as if they were genuinely formed, and the Defendant was able to receive the pass disposal of the parts from the employee in charge of the inspection and deliver them.

1. Around March 2012, the Defendant changed the test report by means of copying the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the name of Gyeongnam-gun E (State Office) and copying the necessary part and number by again inserting the necessary parts and number. Of the test items, the Defendant added “0.91” to “0.78”, “6073012”, “60734129”, “6073108”, “6073108”, and “ms20392-7c115” to “0.91.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant altered the test results under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in Gyeongnam-si, the public document related to the certification of facts, and altered the test results under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration from February 2, 2012 to December 2, 2012, 4 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1, and altered the test results under the total of six times in total, by altering the test results, which are private documents, twice in total.

2. On April 2, 2012, the Defendant exercising the altered test report: (a) in the office of the foregoing company; and (b) in the absence of quality inspection to an official body, in relation to stacks, which are parts for military use of K-1 and K-2, from the victim (ju), despite having not undergone quality inspection to the official body.