The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is as follows: (a) the Defendant only reported that the victim D was dead, and reported that he is sclick with the victim D’s click, and reported that he was sclick with the victim D’s click, and did not assault the victim by using the knicker, and did not commit any retaliation against the criminal offender; (b) the victim F was able not to walk with the victim’s clothes, or he did not agree with the victim F’s face or her click due to drinking, and (c) the knick was click with the victim’s chest while knick, and did not arrest the victim H so that the knick might not come up with the victim’s chest; and (d) the victim was not detained.

Nevertheless, it is unreasonable that the court below found all of the charges guilty.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the victim D’s personal injury or retaliation injury, the lower court acknowledged the facts of assaulting the victim D by using knife for retaliation purposes.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

① Although the victim D was well aware of the Defendant during the course of assaulting the Defendant, and the Defendant did not see what he was when she was the Defendant, the victim stated that “F, as close as close as the victim was assaulted, determined that “The Defendant was able to get the head of the knife with a knife, etc., and knife the knife that knife knife knife knife.”

② In light of the list of seizure and the photograph of seized articles, one kitchen whose knife and knife are separated at the scene of the instant crime, and the kitchen house seems to be separated from the knife and the knife in the process of assaulting the victim D.

(3) A victim D shall be from an investigative agency to the court of original trial.