beta
Text
Defendant
B and C Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
B The above fine shall not be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C A stock company is a corporation established with the objective of mechanical equipment repair, contact, and industrial machinery surface disposal business, etc. from the Busan Seo-gu F, and Defendant B is a managing director of the above company, who acts on behalf of the business owner with respect to the matters concerning workers belonging to the above company.
An employer shall not dismiss or put any worker at a disadvantage on the ground that the worker has joined or attempted to join a trade union, or has attempted to organize a trade union, or has performed any other lawful act for the operation of a trade union.
1. On July 2, 2014, Defendant B unilaterally issued a personnel order to H as a full-time officer of a labor union, even though there was no demand from the labor union for the appointment of a full-time officer of a labor union without any labor-management agreement, on the ground that he did not enter into a collective agreement on the ground that he did not unilaterally receive any demand from the labor union for the appointment of a full-time officer under the status of a labor-management agreement, on the ground that he did not enter into a labor union agreement on the ground that he did not intend to encourage workers to join metal labor union and distributed any printed matter that contains any content of opposition to any disadvantage in the rules of employment, etc. as a member of the company
After that, the Defendant did not pay wages to H on the ground that he was a full-time officer of the labor union and did not provide other workers with a strong awareness.
As a result, the Defendant committed an act of disadvantage to H on the ground that workers H joined a trade union or engaged in any other legitimate act for the work of a trade union.
2. Defendant C Co., Ltd. is at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) and on the ground that the Defendant’s employee B, as above, joined a trade union by workers H as to the Defendant’s work, or did any other legitimate act for a trade union’s work