1. The remaining amount after deducting the expenses for the auction from the proceeds of the sale by selling each real estate listed in the attached list;

In full view of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1, 2, and 3-1, 2, 3, and 4-1, 3-2, and 4 of the evidence Nos. 1 and the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of on-site verification by the party members, each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as "each land of this case") shall be co-owned by Plaintiff A 5/13, Plaintiff D, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C at the time of the closing of the pleadings of this case, and the Defendants shared 1/13, respectively. The fact that the agreement on the method of dividing each land of this case has not been reached between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. In light of the location, area, value of each land of this case after division, and co-owners' relations, each land of this case is difficult to divide in kind, or is likely to be significantly reduced due to the division.

Therefore, it is reasonable to divide the property jointly owned by the method of distributing the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the proceeds from the sale of each of the lands of this case by the joint owners' share ratio. Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition.