1. The plaintiff shall sell 942m2 in the Republic of Korea to auction the sale price which remains after deducting the auction cost from the sale price.

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff and the defendants owned the area of 942 square meters in F. 942 square meters in each share as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the plaintiff and the defendants did not reach an agreement on the method of partition of the above land between the plaintiff and the defendants, one grave in the middle of the above land, and the above land has not been cultivated.

In addition, considering that the Defendants did not present any opinion on the method of dividing the above land, since the above land is unable to be divided in kind or its value is likely to be significantly reduced due to the division, it is reasonable to issue an order to divide the above land by auction.

In order to distribute the remaining amount of the above land to the plaintiff and the defendants after deducting the auction cost from the proceeds of the sale by selling the land at auction, each share in the order.