A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2015, at around 02:28, the Defendant assaulted E, such as “in front of a convenience store located in Changwon-si Masanpoposposposb,” “In front of a convenience store located in Changwon-si B, customer does not get out of the taxi,” the Defendant was able to see the Defendant, who was sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 of the 112 of the cab engineer for business purpose, and was sent to the scene, and the circumstances leading up to the Masanjing Police Station, which had been lockeded, and called “this dog, ice, Chewing,” and read, “In front of the manposb, flap, knif, knif, knif.”

As above, the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of the F and E prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes prepared by G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic field of obstruction of performance of official duties (six to one year and four months), [decision of sentence] 6 months of imprisonment, suspension of execution 2 years of imprisonment, community service order 80 hours (the fact that there is a confession and reflect, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of power above the suspension of execution, and the fact that it is hard to say that the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties will not be repeated again)