1. Defendant Associate Construction Co., Ltd.: (a) the Plaintiff 2,648,764 won and its related thereto, from November 12, 2013 to January 12, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A is the owner of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fdong heading and the house of the second floor neighborhood living facilities and the house (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”), the Plaintiff B is the owner of the Plaintiff’s house of the second floor of G and the sloping slope slave (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) and the Defendant C is the owner of the building located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and E adjacent to the above land (hereinafter “Defendant building”).

B. On February 29, 2012, Defendant C entered into a contract with Defendant Associate Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Associate Construction Co., Ltd.”) for construction of a parking lot and construction extension of buildings on the land owned by the said Defendant C (hereinafter “instant construction”). The Defendant Company, from March 12, 2012 to November 15, 2012, carried out construction works including ground-breaking and replacement of sewage pipes. [Grounds for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 1, 3, 4 evidence, Eul’s 1 through 6 evidence (including land numbers, and the purport of the entire pleadings and the whole purport of pleadings).

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim against Defendant Company

A. The Defendant Company asserted that Plaintiff A was unable to perform the construction as a final steel, while performing the instant ground-breaking construction, left the construction site as it was without taking any particular measure. Accordingly, rainwater was found to be on the floor of the instant construction site, and the Plaintiff Company went into the underground floor of Plaintiff A’s building.

For this reason, the lessee who was living in the plaintiff A's underground floor has withdrawn from the lease contract on the ground of flood, and the plaintiff A paid the tenant the director's fee to H.

Ultimately, the Plaintiff Company’s negligence inflicted damages equivalent to the interest on the lease deposit and the amount paid to the lessee H by the deadline of the existing lease agreement and the new lessee, the total amount of damages, such as the cost of repairing the underground floor of the Plaintiff’s building owned by the Plaintiff, and the cost of repairing the defects of the underground floor, and thus, the Defendant Company is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the said money and the damages for delay.