The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the manager and the victim D (23) was a part-time employee of the above store in Gangnam-gu Seoul.

A. On November 15, 2015, the Defendant would retire from office on the second floor of the above store on November 15, 2015 on the ground that the working conditions of the victim was different from those of the actual working conditions at the time of the interview.

D. Doese, Doz. Doz., Doz., Doz., Doz.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large sound of this weather.

나. 피고인은 같은 날 22:30 경 위 매장 1 층에서, 매장 직원들이 듣는 가운데 피해자에게 “ 뭘 꼬라 보냐.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to a large sound as gymar spathy.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1). According to the written agreement bound in the trial records of this case, the victim may recognize the fact that the complaint against the defendant was revoked on March 29, 2016, which is the date of the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.