The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the victim B (30 years, remaining) were those who worked as the same in C (State).

A. On July 19, 2016, at around 12:30 on July 19, 2016, the Defendant changed the payment details to the victim who manages the benefits within the office of the management business team office of Da (State), and changed the payment details to the victim, and the victim suffered the defect without any brucation, the Defendant changed the payment details to the victim on the ground that: (a) the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, the C, and the N, only one person for whom you

12 22 22 142;

The victim openly insultingd the victim at a place where two employees of the company exist by speaking in a large voice.

B. The Defendant, at around 11:00 on March 2, 2017, at the same place as above, “A,” and at the same time as “A,” the Defendant, on the ground that she was forced to make an unfair dismissal, and her victim was the victim’s son, the Defendant, “A son, son, son, etc., of a bit of a bitch bitch.,”

The victim openly insultingd at a place where the employees of the company work by friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend fri

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and may be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, according to the investigation report by the court investigator, the victim B, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, expressed his/her intent to withdraw the defendant's punishment to the court around August 2017.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.