logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018.12.13.선고 2018두57964 판결
유기기구지정배제및기타유원시설업허가취소처분취소의소
Cases

2018du57964, 2018du57971(joint intervention) and the revocation of revocation of permission for other amusement facility business

Plaintiff-Appellant

[Attachment 1] The list is as shown in the list of plaintiffs.

1. The third-party intervenor, appellant

[Attachment 2] The list of third party participants shall be as specified in the list.

Defendant-Appellee

Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu3335, 2018Nu399 decided September 6, 2018 (joint intervention)

Imposition of Judgment

December 13, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs and third party intervenors.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

December 12, 2018, 13

Judges

Justices Kim Jae-soo

Justices Kim Jong-il

Chief Justice Lee Dong-won

Justices Park Il-san

arrow