The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant is led to confession and reflect; (b) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is not serious; (c) the record of the same punishment and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; (d) the police officer who is performing official duties is assaulted to the police officer; and (e) the fact that the victimized police officer is seeking punishment; and (e) the victim police officer

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.