The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and it cannot be deemed unfair in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, etc.; (b) the punishment of the lower court is too unreasonable, taking account of the following factors: (c) the Defendant’s act was committed in favor of the confession of the judgment; (d) there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and (e) there was no gravity of violence; and (e) the police officer dispatched due to the Defendant’s act was

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.