logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.24 2014가단5160356
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant Stile Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Stile Construction”) entered into a contract for workers’ disaster mutual aid to cover damages incurred by the beneficiaries due to an occupational accident that occurred between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s employees, on May 18, 2009, when the construction was jointly awarded a contract for the construction of the Dongb circulation road between the prime State Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the Hani Construction Co., Ltd. and the Hani Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Stile Construction”).

B. On April 1, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract for the daily work of KRW 110,000 per day with the early construction and began to work at the same construction site located in Taeju-dong, Taeju-dong.

C. At around 15:30 on May 3, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) while carrying out the construction of melting soil at the construction site at the above site, Belgium was broken down or broken; (b) the Plaintiff, along with B, engaged in Belgium work; and (c) in such a case, the Plaintiff’s right hand hand hand over between B and B due to the erroneous operation of the machinery’s location, was faced with the upper part of the 5th right hand hand hand over between B and B, (d) deep heat of the 4 balance, and (e) 2 balance.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Plaintiff received temporary layoffs 23,285,890 won, medical care benefits 15,921,060 won, disability benefits 4,416,500 won on the grounds that the instant accident was an occupational accident.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 9, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Judgment on the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion at the above construction site was conducted by both the employees employed by the Defendant Symar and the employees employed by Mymar Construction, and the instant accident occurred during the same place of work.

arrow