All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the principle of free evaluation of evidence among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the limitation of acceptance and the exclusion and avoidance of a public official under Article 113 subparag. 4 of the Act, or by violating the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the interpretation of acceptance of a case under Article 113 subparag. 4 of the Act, and the interpretation of attorney-at-law under Article 31(1)3 of the Act.

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the relevant legal principles and records, it is just for the court below to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the public prosecutor of the charges of this case on the ground that there is no evidence of crime regarding the acceptance of the bribery after the illegal disposition among the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. There is no violation of law by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.