The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

According to its reasoning, the court below affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there is no proof of a crime regarding the acquisition of the third party bribe among the facts charged in the instant case and the violation of the law of defense related to D and E companies, and reversed the judgment of the court of first instance that convicted the Defendant of the violation of the law of O-related attorneys, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but the notice of appeal does not state the grounds for appeal, and there is no statement of the grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.