All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to each of the punishments (two years of suspended sentence in the month of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence in the month of suspended sentence in the month of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence in the month of suspended sentence in the month of imprisonment, and the number of punishments 1 through 11) is unfair because it is too unfasible.

Judgment

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The size of the game of this case is reasonable.

Defendant

C as the business owner of the game of this case, was led to the crime of this case with the Defendant A as the owner of the game of this case.

Defendant

B has the same kind of power.

The most advantageous circumstance shows the attitude of the defendants to recognize and reflect the crime of this case.

In full view of the aforementioned unfavorable circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and character environment, the motive and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant arguments and records, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal against the defendants is groundless.