logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.05.15 2015고단165
석유및석유대체연료사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall manufacture, import, store, transport, keep or sell pseudo petroleum products.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around March 201, sold 18,00 won in total to C and D, a pseudo petroleum product seller, and sold pseudo petroleum product 18,000 won in total at the above place from around that time to November 201, by mixing 18,000 won in a pseudo petroleum product 18,000 won in total with the pseudo petroleum product 18,000 won in total at the pseudo petroleum product 18,8,000 won in total at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (revision of facts and report on the results of investigation), copies of decisions, copies of written opinions, and copies of written expert opinions;

1. Article 44 Subparag. 3 of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 29 (1) 1 of the former Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act (Amended by Act No. 11081, Nov. 14, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is a violation of the legislative intent of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act, which aims to contribute to the development of the national economy and the improvement of the people's lives by stabilizing the supply and demand of petroleum and stabilizing the prices of petroleum, and securing the proper quality of petroleum products and alternative fuel, and the nature of the crime is not good. Although the defendant had been punished for the same crime once, the crime of this case again led to the crime of this case, and in light of the period and quantity

I would like to say.

However, the defendant is recognized as committing a crime, and currently is engaged in other occupation and is trying not to repeat a crime.

arrow