A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Inc., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Inc., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., (b) borrowed money

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant was declared bankrupt in 2009, and at the time of the instant case, the property did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed amount, on the ground that the property was at the time of the operation of the said business, only KRW 25 million, but also there was a debt loan in the amount of KRW 17,00,000,000.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 22 million won from the victim under the same day as the borrowed money.

2. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant loaned only KRW 12 million to the victim’s original money that he/she works in a fluencies, “The operation of the original money he/she works is difficult.” The Defendant would have to fully repaid all the borrowed money from the company previously worked to him/her before the discharge of KRW 100 million from the company.

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money because it was difficult for the Defendant to take economic circumstances as described in paragraph (1) and it was false that KRW 100 million occurred.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim the remittance of KRW 12 million as the borrowed money on the same day.

3. On November 4, 2013, the Defendant extended a loan of KRW 3,50,000 to the victim’s money borrowed before receiving KRW 4550,00,000 from the Defendant’s company to which the Defendant is working.

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money because it was difficult for the Defendant to carry out the economic circumstances as described in paragraph (1) and it was necessary to deposit money or received a business loan.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and 3.5 million won in the name of the same day from the victim.