Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant around May 20, 2009 at the convenience store operated by the victim E in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City around May 20, 2009, he/she will lend the victim the amount of KRW 5 million to the victim.

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to absence of a certain occupation.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and was given 5 million won from the victim in the name of the borrowed money.

2. The Defendant, at the above convenience store around October 12, 2009, would have to pay the victim a full payment with the money borrowed from the Defendant to the money borrowed from the Defendant on or before the loan of five million won.

In the phrase, “one-brupted area” was the victim, and the victim was the victim.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party due to absence of a certain occupation, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it, and the victim already sold the money to another person.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and was given 5 million won from the victim in the name of the borrowed money.

3. The Defendant, at the above convenience store around February 2010, would lend the victim the sum of KRW 3 million to the victim.

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to absence of a certain occupation.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and was given KRW 3 million on the pretext of the borrowed money from the injured party.

4. The Defendant, at the above convenience store around July 2010, would lend the victim the sum of KRW 3 million to the victim.

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to absence of a certain occupation.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 3 million won from the victim as the borrowed money.