logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2017.09.13 2017나662
전부금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance states "the defendant" as "the company of this case" under the five pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The plaintiff's assertion in this court is different from the argument in the first instance court. The defendant set the payment period of the second transfer price of this case to "when the conditions of paragraph 5 (c) of this case are fully met" in the agreement in this case constitutes a suspension condition or an indefinite period, and if the purport of the whole argument is added to each of the entries in the evidence Nos. 8 and 9, the agreement in this case shall be 5-b. 3. 3. . . . .. .. .. .. . the land listed in the separate sheet No. 11 (current X), the annexed Schedule No. 12 (current Y, Y, Z, AB, etc.) is not exchanged in the land listed in the annexed Table No. 11 (current Chuncheon City, Y, Y, AB, and AB). Thus, the plaintiff's claim for the second transfer price of this case is not satisfied or the period for which the above suspension conditions have not yet arrived.

arrow