logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.27 2015누54324
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged in the trial of the court of first instance do not differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court. The circumstances of the first instance court’s determination are as follows: ① (a) neither the advisory doctor of the Defendant nor the expert opinion of the first instance court (new medicine specialist) can recognize the injury of the instant case to the Plaintiff; (b) there is no causal link between the outbreak of the pelvise and the pelvise liver damage; and (c) there is no causal link between the outbreak of the pelvise and the pellog damage upon the Plaintiff’s treatment; and (b) the expert opinion of the first instance presented in the diagnosis of the Maume Hospital of the Maume University; and (b) there is no record that the examination of the Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Maume Ma.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The decision of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow