1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

A. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, September 2, 2014, respectively.

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's main claim

A. The plaintiff is a company whose purpose is building design and construction supervision business, etc., and the defendant is building construction business, engineering work business, housing construction business, etc.

on September 6, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a design contract for the construction of the main complex A in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (No. 2, No. 1, 2, hereinafter “instant design contract”).

The main contents are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff designs the second underground floor, multi-family housing of the 11st floor, business facilities (a building area: 429.39 square meters; total floor area: 4,813.75 square meters; hereinafter “Ctel”); and (b) the Defendant shall pay 114,00,000 won as the service price to the Plaintiff; (c) the down payment of KRW 14,00,000 for the remainder amount is paid at the time of the contract and the payment of KRW 100,000 for the remainder amount is paid at the time of the contract and the payment of KRW 100,000 is to be made in substitution with the Ctel 203.

On November 2, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a design contract for the new construction of D Main Complex (No. 4, No. 2, hereinafter “instant design contract”).

The main contents are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff design on the 4th underground floor, multi-family housing of 13 stories above ground, business facilities, and neighborhood living facilities (a total of 449.62 square meters and total floor area: 5,263.87 square meters; hereinafter “Ftel”); and (b) the Defendant shall pay 110,000,000 won as the service price for it; (c) the down payment of KRW 10,000,000 shall be paid at the time of the contract and the remainder of KRW 100,000 shall be paid at the time of the contract, and the payment of KRW 100,000 shall be made in accord with payment in kind with Ctel 204 to be newly constructed.

Applicant The Plaintiff fulfilled all design agreements in the instant case 1 and 2, and accordingly, the Defendant obtained approval for the use of C Officetel on May 9, 2014, and F Officetel on September 25, 2014.

In addition, the defendant on May 20, 2014, No. 203 of the C Officetel 203.