logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.08.12 2016고합179
현주건조물방화미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:30, 6302, 702, and around that time, found the Defendant’s house at C Apartment-si around 22:30 on June 6, 2016, and sought a divorce by the victim D, who is the victim D, to leave the house by wrapping.

In other words, the sound "Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, using a one-time tool (Evidence No. 1) to put the flowers-shaped plant attached to the kitchen and the kitchen in the kitchen room of the apartment, and the garris and clothes attached to the flowers-shaped plant attached to the kitchen in the kitchen room of the apartment, and the victim did not immediately go to the wind of extinguishing the gas in the kitchen, but did not go to the attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. 112 reported matters;

1. Investigation report (in relation to the on-site photo analysis of the case, including photographs attached thereto);

1. Application of existing Acts and subordinate statutes of disposable gasers (No. 1) that has been seized;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of attempted punishment: Articles 25(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. 몰수 형법 제 48조 제 1 항 제 1호 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 관한 판단 피고인 및 변호인은 피고인이 이 사건 범행 당시 가스레인지에 불을 켠 사실은 없다고 주장하나, 피해자가 피고인이 가스레인지에 불을 켜 자신이 바로 끄고 밸브도 잠갔다며 범행 상황과 피해자의 대응에 대해서 직접 경험한 대로 진술하고 있는 것으로 보이는 점( 수사기록 제 25 쪽), 피고 인도 수사기관에서는 가스레인지에 불을 켠 사실을 인정한 점( 수사기록 제 36 쪽) 등을 고려 하면 피고인이 가스레인지에 불을 켠 사실을 합리적 의심 없이 인정할 수 있으므로 피고인 및 변호인의 주장은 받아들이지...

arrow