Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the crime of indecent act by compulsion in Seoul Southern District Court on April 4, 2017. The Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information on which the judgment became final and conclusive on April 4, 2017. Where basic personal information, such as his/her address and real place of residence, is changed, the person subject to registration of personal information shall submit the reason and details of the change to the head of

1. On November 16, 2017, the Defendant failed to submit the modified basic personal information within 20 days without justifiable grounds, even though the address and actual domicile of the same Gu C from Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the same Gu C was changed.

2. Around December 4, 2018, the Defendant did not submit the modified basic personal information within 20 days without justifiable grounds, even though his/her domicile and actual domicile were changed in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D building, E, and its actual domicile in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (related to the verification of persons subject to personal information of a suspect / accompanied by a certified copy or abstract of a suspect's resident registration, a copy of a personal information

1. Relevant Article 50 (3) 2 and Article 43 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Violence Crimes, the Selection of a fine for the crime, and the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is difficult to deem that there were special circumstances to deem that the Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, failed to perform his/her duty as a person subject to registration of personal information two times, and failed to perform this duty.

In addition, in full view of the present arguments and the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, the amount of fine for the summary order is not excessive, and it is so decided as per Disposition.