logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.06.05 2014고정816
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 18, 2014.

The Defendant and B (B) together with F, which are intermedian in charge of 'TM', with D, E, etc., and intermedian intermediate intermediate intermediate, are capable of microcrediting the mobile phone text or telephone without permission from many and unspecified persons, and the application for the establishment of a mobile phone is required only formally under the same condition, and is not through the actual opening of the mobile phone, and a copy of identification card, a certificate of personal seal, an application for the establishment of a mobile phone, etc. is received from the loan applicant and received the mobile phone in the name of the loan applicant so that the mobile phone will be delivered to the loan applicant and the payment for the mobile phone will be imposed on the loan applicant, and the opened mobile phone will be

As a result, D and E paid identification card copies, certificates of personal seal impression, etc. to F, who is a loaner of one mobile phone with his identity card copies, certificates of personal seal impression, etc., on condition that they receive 500,000 won per mobile phone from the persons who wish to obtain small loans through the telecomer employed by them, and F, by using the corresponding loaner’s cell phone to verify the identity of the opening of the mobile phone, sold the opening of the mobile phone and the relevant recording file again to the defendant who is the sales book of the mobile phone, and the defendant shall pay 20,000 won per mobile phone, which was known to him, and the defendant again provided the above documents and recording files to B, who prepared an application for opening of the mobile phone in the name of the loaner, and then disposed of the mobile phone in the name of the applicant for the loan, using the same via the Internet.

2.3.

arrow