The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the victim D who is between the victim D and the E clan member, and

1. On October 22, 2012, at the conference room, G located in Syang-si, G located in Syang-si, at around 12:0, the victim considered that the victim D (the age of 81) was aware of having been in the position of auditor E, and that the victim was able to distribute to the directors of the board of directors the book “for any false forgery or alteration in the family table among the Korean questions,” 10 books were attached to the defendant who tried to go up, and the victim was able to go up again, and the victim was able to use the defendant, but the victim was able to purchase the victim’s right chest on one occasion with his right blue part and continuously sold the right blue part of the victim, and 42 days of treatment days, and caused the victim to take multiple treatment (the victim was 5, 6, 7, 8, 97, 87, 87, 8, 8).

2. At the same date, time and place as referred to in paragraph 1, “A with respect to a false forgery of a false representation in the family register among the Korean questions,” which the victim prepared was stolen by taking 93,600 won at his/her hand.

2. The evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes D’s police and legal statement, H’s legal statement, accusation, confirmation of each fact of H and I, and the injury diagnosis statement.

However, the above evidence and the records are added to the court statements in I, J, K, and L, i.e., ① “the defendant did not regard D prices as stated in the facts charged, and rather, the victim was able to keep the Defendant’s hand hick with the Defendant’s hand hick with the Defendant’s hand hick with the Defendant’s hand hick with the Defendant’s hand hick,” and L also argued that “the Defendant did not dispute with each other while preventing the Defendant from gathering the hand hick as stated in the facts charged, but rather, the Defendant did not regard the Defendant’s hand hick with the Defendant’s hand hick.”