The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal and the statements of the victim and H, the lower court acquitted the facts charged of the instant case, which erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

(a) Recognition of guilt must be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to have the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt.

B. He returned to the instant case, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, i.e., (i) the Defendant was subject to continuous disputes, and D was punished several times due to defamation, etc. against the Defendant. If the Defendant was injured by a crym crym crym crym, which requires treatment for about 42 days, as stated in the facts charged, D did not actively express the Defendant’s assertion about the Defendant’s assault to other members at the time of the instant case, or at around January 28, 2013 after the issuance of the instant complaint at around 3 months after the date of the instant case (the date of diagnosis of the injury diagnosis is October 24, 2012), (ii) the J and K did not acknowledge that D’s testimony was consistent with the Defendant’s assertion that D’s crym crym l', which was submitted at the time of the instant accusation, and (iv) it did not appear that D’s statement to the effect that D’s testimony was consistent with the Defendant’s assertion.