1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant, who is engaged in the newspaper business under the trade name of “D”, provided various printed materials from the Plaintiff who was engaged in the printing business to the police officer on May 2009, and did not pay KRW 33650,000,000,000,000,000,000 from March 201 to June of the same year, was supplied with printed materials, and that the Plaintiff was obligated to pay the unpaid amount to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, as to whether the defendant received the above printed materials from the plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize the above facts only with the results of the statement as to whether the defendant received the above printed materials, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and the response of the order to submit tax information to the director of the Busan District Tax Office. There

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is difficult to accept.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that even if the Defendant did not trade printed matters as referred to in paragraph (1) between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the Defendant permitted the Intervenor, who was his/her imprisonment, to trade printed matters using the Defendant’s name or trade name, and thus, the Defendant is liable to pay the price to the Plaintiff, who was mistaken for the Defendant as the proprietor of the business.

It is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant allowed the supplementary intervenor to use the defendant's name or trade name, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s above assertion.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.