logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2020.04.28 2019고단2669
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 11:30 on August 25, 2019, the Defendant: (b) was able to ask the victim D, who is a cafeteria, to refrain from being drunkd; (c) the Defendant: (d) was able to take a fluorcated customer; (d) fluorcing the bitch of a bitch; (e) fluorcing the fluor; (e) fluorcing the fluor’s site; and (e) fluorcing the fluorc in a large voice; and (e) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by having approximately 20-minutes of customers, who were eating the 20-minute of the said victim, going out of the cafeteria; and (e) interfered with the victim’s restaurant business.

2. The Defendant, upon receipt of a report on 112 that “a person who fright is killed” at the same date, time, and place as indicated in paragraph 1, and was arrested from the Busan Western Police Station E Zone G to the E Zone on the same day on or around 12:10 of the same day, and was transferred to the E Zone on or around 12:10 of the same day, and, while the D et al. is kept, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim G by publicly emphasizing that “a person who frights to Chewing, frighted, killed with a knife, dead with a knife, and died with a knife” to the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of On-Site photographs);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fine) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, acknowledges his criminal act.

The defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant under an agreement with D, which is the victim of the crime of interference with business.

The defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow