1. On October 12, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral expense against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2...

Details of the disposition

The deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”), the spouse of the Plaintiff, worked for the Company C (hereinafter “instant Company”) from March 5, 2003 to the time of death, and was in charge of the business affairs.

From about 10:30 on April 28, 2012, the Deceased was sent to an emergency room at the Gannam University Hospital on the same day by the 12:45 rescue team around 12:00 on the same day, and the deceased died on the same day on the same day, as he was sent back to the emergency room at the Gannam University Hospital on the 12:45 on the same day on the same day, considering that he was 40 minutes after the commencement of the mountain and around 40 minutes after the lapse of 10 minutes.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant disaster”). The direct deathist in the written diagnosis of death is “Abrupted Maculer Maculer Maculer Macul (Presumption),” and the private person causing the death is “abrupt Macul (the statement of a

On October 12, 2012, on the Plaintiff’s bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses claims, the Defendant rendered a decision on site payment on the ground that “the proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and his/her duties cannot be recognized.”

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the Disposition of this case as to the facts that there was no dispute, Gap’s statement Nos. 1 and 8, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole, was lawful, as a business member of the pharmaceutical supply company, and the Plaintiff’s doctor, officer, and employee of the hospital, who is the customer as a part of the pharmaceutical supply company, went back to the meeting at a late time. The Plaintiff brought about a meeting such as golf or mountain.

Even on the day of the instant accident, the Deceased was killed while serving as the doctor, staff, etc. of the Daegu Veterans Hospital, which is a business partner, in the extension of the business, on the day of the instant accident. While there was a proximate causal relation with the deceased’s work, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

In fact, the deceased, such as his career and work form, etc., worked at another pharmaceutical manufacturer from July 1, 1995 to October 10, 2003, while serving in another pharmaceutical manufacturer.