1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses to the Plaintiff.

1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the disposition is consistent with the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (as stated in the second instance court's judgment No. 2 and 14). Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(C) On April 13, 2013, the Plaintiff’s husband, who was a bank personnel, lost consciousness with the family members and two customers on April 13, 2013, and died to the hospital, but the Defendant made a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on April 2, 201.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by chronic paths and stress to perform business activities to achieve the business performance assigned to him/her, and was used as part of his/her business activities on the day of his/her holiday and died after the Plaintiff’s death. As such, a proximate causal relationship is recognized between the instant disaster and the death of the deceased.

B. 1) On April 13, 2013, the Deceased’s death (the situation on the day of the disaster in this case) took a secondary break from around normal (800m) to around normal (800m) and died at around 12:32, as the head of the team leader who was employed on January 30, 1989, and was assigned to the Hospital on February 13, 2013, with 11:00 members of the Dong-won and two customers, who were in charge of the duties of the Deceased, and were in charge of the duties of the Deceased, and were in charge of the duties of the deceased at around 12:32, but was transferred to the Hospital at around 13:20.

Classification 12 weeks between 4 weeks.