logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 11. 15. 선고 2012두18066 판결
(심리불속행) 근로소득 등이 있어 영농자녀에 해당하지 아니함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court ( Jeju) 2012Nu81 (Law No. 18, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

Board of Audit and Inspection (Law No. 112, 2012)

Title

(Trialless Conduct) Employment income, etc. does not constitute farming children.

Summary

(C) A farmer who is eligible for gift tax reduction or exemption refers to a person who manages and cultivates farmland, etc. under his/her own responsibility without entrusting or lending it to another person, and is appointed as a public official and whose quantity of citrus shipment falls short of the average shipment quantity of the farmers in the same area, and thus does not constitute a farmer.

Cases

2012Du180666 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Jeju Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court ( Jeju) Decision 2012Nu81 Decided July 18, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case, the judgment of the court below, and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow