logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.22 2017고합188
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years, for five years, for Defendant B, for a fine of KRW 3,00,000, for Defendant C, and for Defendant D.

Reasons

On September 13, 2012, Defendant B was released on November 29, 2013 and the parole period passed on January 10, 2014.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the Defendants’ defense rights are not practically infringed, the phrases, expressions, etc. of the facts charged were partly modified.

In around 2014 to 2015, the residents of the Gu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (OO) prepared a written consent on the designation of district unit planning zones and the establishment of plans for district unit planning zones, or a sales contract for real estate (hereinafter referred to as “the instant district unit designation agreement, etc.”) to promote redevelopment (hereinafter referred to as “integrated development project”) by integrating the residents’ land and the parts adjacent to the above residents’ land (hereinafter referred to as “ Q lot”) among the P granted districts (hereinafter referred to as “the aforementioned integrated development project”).

Meanwhile, the establishment promotion committee of the S Regional Housing Association (hereinafter “instant association”) (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) concluded a contract with U to vicariously perform all the affairs of the instant association, such as the recruitment of members of the instant association for T business and the sale of T in lots, on the ground of the area of 22,900 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), excluding Q site, to construct an apartment complex (T is referred to as “T”) by the method of the regional housing association (hereinafter “T business”), around October 2016, with the regional housing association (hereinafter “U”) on the ground of the Gu Government-si 22,90 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

Defendant

D is a U representative director, and Defendant A is a person who is actually engaged in T business with Defendant D and takes office as U’s auditor and is actually engaged in U’s joint activities.

Defendant

B is a director of U in practice, who is in charge of U's business and enters into a contract with U to perform membership recruitment service on behalf of U (V (hereinafter referred to as "V") with W.

arrow