logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단1185
현주건조물방화예비
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2018, at around 13:15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while she was under the influence of alcohol at one’s own house located in Chuncheon-si B, she was fluencing and drinking to her house, and she was fluencing and drinking to her house; (b) “ging to her inside and outside her house,” and she used plastics containing 1 liter, which the Defendant had been kept in custody as a warehouse; and (c) as such, the Defendant’s denial was sealed out of her house, and her and her her flucing to her gasoline was flucing the gasoline on the floor of the road before her house, and did not reach the commencement of fire prevention, but did not reach the commencement of fire prevention.

Accordingly, the defendant was prepared to prevent the existing building in which she is denied and her children, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Legal chemical appraisal statement [the defendant asserted that the defendant merely intended to put the carcin into the carcin in the carcin, and did not have the purpose of fire prevention. However, in light of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, namely, the defendant opened a string and math in the warehouse in his/her residence and opened the string of gasoline in the process of dispute with the victim, thereby spreading gasoline to himself/herself and the victim, as if he/she tried to put the gasoline out of the strings, and even after being sealed out of the strings, it is deemed that the defendant had the intention to prevent the building that people use as a residence. Accordingly, the above argument is rejected.] The above argument is not applicable to the law.

1. A defendant who has reasons for sentencing under Articles 175 and 164(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow