A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 15:36 April 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stated that “A police officer, who was urged to return home from the police officer E, a police officer belonging to the D Zone, who was dispatched to the D Zone, would be forced to return home from the police officer E, and the above E, who assaulted the above E to walk one time, thereby obstructing police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report of 112.

On July 12, 2018, the Defendant, around 22:15, 2018, 1589, took a bath to customers while drinking alcohol in the victim G (n, 50 years of age)’s 'H’ house located in Busan Shipping Daegu F, and used the victim to avoid disturbance, and assaulted the victim by having the victim take a 112-report defect and by having the victim take a scopic disease, which is an object dangerous to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 758"

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each investigation report "2018 Highest 1589";

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of four Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report of investigation, a report of 112 case list, and on-site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances are considered in favor of the sentencing in mind):

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is due to the following: (a) the crime of this case was committed by a disturbance, such as breathing under the influence of alcohol, by exercising violence against police officers dispatched after receiving a report 112, and taking a bath to customers while drinking in a house; and (b) the owner of the business took a 112 report to the defect owner, and assaulting the 112 report to the defect owner; and (c) the crime is bad in nature; and (d) the disease of the defendant committed against the above owner of the business, especially the face of the above fluence.