Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2017, 2017, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the police officer F, who belongs to the police station E Zone of the Jeju Seo-gu Police Station, called the “F”, in response to a report, who was sent to the C church located in B by around 05:20 on August 9, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

On April 9, 2018, 2018, the Defendant 2018 Godan 802, the Defendant avoided the disturbance of the victim’s convenience store operation by harming the victim’s convenience store operation by force by forcing customers who had been in a place to take charge of the charge of the charge of the mobile phone charging from the I Interlock in H located in the Jeju-si managed by the victim G to 02:10.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 271"

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Videos (one CD);

1. 2018 Highest 802, a CD image (total of three pages) interfering with the performance of public duties;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. On-site photographs and the list of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV image data;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order / [In relation to interference with the performance of official duties, the defendant and his/her defense counsel provided that D, a parking problem, "the defendant committed a crime of damaging property" against the police officer, and the person who committed an actual crime of destroying property is the defendant.